Vedic astrology birth chart free analysis
Email Email. Your Email address is required. Please wait while we process your birth details Your birth details are being processed. This won't take long. Please wait Education - Next 12 Months. Your Lucky Gemstones. Discuss With Our Astrologers. Marriage Compatibility.
Finances - Next 12 Months. Career - Next 12 Months. If you do not know the exact birth or event time, you can select a range. The program will automatically correct for daylight saving time if this is needed for your date and location. You do not need to make this correction yourself.
You can also use this program to get a personalized daily horoscope which gives both positive and negative factors affecting you today. No sign-up or download is needed.
You do not need to enter your real names, and can use initials or an alias if you prefer. Your Birth Chart and Astrology Report, or Daily Forecast, will be shown instantly, together with interpretation of the various astrological elements. The program allows you to save your details, allowing you to return at any time to review your birth chart, or to obtain a new forecast.
- Free Vedic Horoscope Predictions for life.
- How to read & analyse birth chart??!
- Free Birth Chart.
- 12 st january horoscope;
- kajama horoscope pisces.
- taurus march 18 horoscope 2020.
Note: 'All Services' lists other astrological analyses available from astromix. A proper discussion of the problem does not appear in his texts either, and the reason for this may lie in the fact that the time was not ripe, because the exact value of the precession was not known yet or astronomers of his time did not know how to treat the problem.
The solution for this difficult problem was not too urgent either in that time, because the two zodiacs roughly coincided. Also later, when Indian astronomy had progressed further and the speed of precession was roughly known, astrologers did not discuss the question whether a sidereal or the tropical zodiac should be used. They decided to use sidereal zodiacs, but did not give a reason for it. However, the question concerning the sidereal and the tropical zodiac did not have the same urgency in India as it had in Europe. Astronomically, the sidereal Aries point has nothing special about it.
Ancient Indian astronomy, however, believed that this point in the sky was extremely prominent in that it played an important part in the history of the universe. For, at the end of every great age or yugam , it was believed, all planets would come together to this point and form an exact conjunction. Moreover, the precession cycle according to an ancient theory begins on the same date and at the sidereal zero point of Aries. In the Kaliyuga year BC, the vernal point would have been in conjunction with the Sun, the Moon and all planets at the sidereal Aries point. Then it would have entered into Aries, after a period of years, in AD, again returned to the zero point and then entered Pisces.
Now, according to modern astronomy, these ideas based on the trepidation model of precession are wrong. They considered the motion of the equinoxes as a cycle of minor importance in the great age.
19 Organized Free Vedic Natal Chart Interpretations
Hence the idea of a sidereal zodiac must have been more convincing to ancient astrologers than a tropical zodiac. From the above follows: The sidereal zero point makes sense only on the basis of ancient Indian astronomical theories that are erroneous according to modern astronomy:. After modern astronomy has shown that these two traditional teachings are not correct, the validity of the sidereal zodiac is seriously challenged.
The sidereal zodiac has no sensible definition anymore.
This question is of central importance because without a well-founded zero point there can be no correct positions of the planets in zodiac signs, lunar mansions, and other subdivisions of the ecliptic. And without these there can be no correct astrological chart interpretations and predictions.
The sidereal zodiac can be defined by its difference to the tropical zodiac, i. It is named after the Calcuttan astronomer and astrologer Nirmala Chandra Lahiri, who was a member of the Reform Committee. This standard is mandatory not only for astrology but also for astronomical ephemerides and almanacs and calendars published in India. The calendar is affected because the months of the Hindu calendar are bound to the sign ingresses of the sun in the sidereal zodiac.
Before the reform, India had more than 30 different local calendars that used different methods to calculate the dates of important religious holidays. The new standard ensures that these holidays are celebrated on the same day in all regions of India. Where did this sidereal zodiac that was fixed at the star Spica originate? In ancient Indian sources, unfortunately, it is not clearly attested. In other words, the sidereal positions of the planets in a natal chart have an uncertainty of several degrees.
Hence, it is not without reason that the introduction of the Lahiri standard has led to bitter quarrels. So when and by whom was the Lahiri zodiac invented? It seems that Lahiri was inspired by the astronomy historian S.
- Free Vedic Birth Chart Analysis by Date of Birth.
- FREE Vedic Astrology Birth Chart Interpretation & Report.?
- astrology answers weekly horoscope january 3.
- scorpio weekly horoscope for january 5 2020.
- scorpio weekly 29 to 4 tarot.
- astrology answers refund;
- Vedic Astrology - critically examined;
Dikshit, who in the late 19th century wrote an important book on the history of Indian astronomy. Dikshit came to the conclusion that, given the prominence that Vedic religion gave to the cardinal points of the tropical year, the Indian calendar should be reformed and no longer be based on the sidereal, but on the tropical zodiac. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that the Lahiri zodiac was brought to India by the Greeks and that it was known there at least for some time.
History shows however that both sidereal zodiacs mentioned above are chosen completely at random. As has been stated, all astrological and astronomical works of late antiquity state that the initial points of the cardinal signs of the zodiac coincide with the cardinal points of the year. Now, as these works were not all written in the same year, it follows that, relative to sphere of the fixed stars, all these works chose the inital points of their zodiacs at different places. This work was probably written in the 2nd century CE. Now, if the sidereal zero point is defined by the position of the vernal equinox in an ancient epoch, it becomes clear how arbitrary its definition is.
How could it be a reliable fundament for astrology? Also, it should have become clear that the idea of some romantics that Indian astrology as we know it is based on millennia-old scientific experience is completely mistaken. Let us close the article with a few considerations from the point of view of a western astrologer!
As has been shown, there are strong arguments against the claim of Vedic astrologers that the validity of the sidereal zodiac has been corroborated over thousands of years of practice in India: The sidereal zodiac has been use in India for less than years. Its exact starting point, which is controversial, was not chosen based on astrological experience, but due to the position of the vernal equinox at some point in late antiquity.
Besides, I have not mentioned yet that the ephemeris calculation of ancient and medieval India contained massive errors, depending on the epoch and local tradition. Moreover, the correct calculation of the ascendant for a birth chart was anything but trivial. Considering all these facts it is hard to explain how a particular sidereal zodiac could have been corroborated by experience. And it is out of question that it could have proved to be better than the tropical zodiac, because the tropical-sidereal issue was never even discussed in India.
The tropical-sidereal problem becomes even more complicated by the fact that the sidereal zodiac is used in a quite different way in Indian astrology than the tropical zodiac in western astrology. Traditional Indian astrology is extremely focused on fate prediction and character compatibility for weddings and not so much on psychological character interpretation, as taught in the West.
Unlike Europeans and Americans, Indians do not ask each other about their Sun sign, but rather about the lunar mansion of their natal moon. Here, a western astrologer may suspect that the lack of psychological interpretation of the Sun sign in India could be caused by the fact that it just does not work with the sidereal zodiac; or that the relevance of the tropical zodiac was not discovered in India because Hindu astrology is not particularly interested in character interpretation.
In any case, the particular way of using the zodiac cannot be ignored in deciding which of the two zodiacs is correct. Western solar astrology, which is based on the tropical zodiac, is in no way challenged by eastern sidereal lunar astrology. Gil Brand opts for the sidereal zodiac, and his argumentation seems somehow stringent.
However, I notice that he does not have his focus on the interpretation of the zodiacal signs, but rather the astrological dignities. For the father of psychoanalysis, I would clearly prefer an ascendant in tropical Scorpio and the Sun in tropical Taurus over a sidereal Libra ascendant and Aries sun. With Hitler the tropical Taurus Sun territorial thinking, nationalism holds at least as good as a sidereal Aries Sun.